Vol. I · Solana edition — Slot —SOL —
Verdictly

The memecoin court of record. Every verdict shows its working.

Front page · Method

Every coin gets a verdict. Every verdict shows its working.

By the Verdictly desk · today

A balance weighing a coin’s evidence: points earned on one pan, points lost on the other
Fig. 1 The scales of the docket. Each newest filing is weighed on its market data, points earned against points lost.

A memecoin verdict is only as good as its evidence. Verdictly checks a coin the way a court reporter covers a case. We read the mint account on Solana to see who can still create or freeze tokens. We list every Token-2022 extension and what it allows. We add up the share of supply held by the ten largest wallets, leaving out the pools. Then we weigh liquidity, age and trading against what those numbers usually mean.

Each finding is printed next to its source and the points it earned. The weights are yours to change. If two coins are standing trial on the same afternoon, put them side by side.

Docket digest

  • Waiting for the first filings…

Special report · From evidence to ruling

How a ruling goes to press

Four sources are read. Ten findings are weighed. One score, one stamp. Scroll to watch a specimen case being set in type.

  1. Mint accountauthorities, extensions
  2. DexScreenerliquidity, age, trades
  3. Largest holderstop-10 share, pools set aside
  4. Jupiter recordholders, organic score
Specimen case · illustrative numbers

$SPECIMEN

    0score out of 100
    MixedspecimenRecord

    Section B · The Verdict

    In the matter of…

    Paste a mint or pick a filing from the docket. We read DexScreener, the Solana mint account, the largest token accounts and Jupiter’s token record, then rule.

    No case before the court. Choose a filing from the docket above, or paste any Solana token mint.

    Section C · Score breakdown

    Set the weights, watch the score move

    A verdict is a weighted sum. Here are the weights. Drag any of them and the current case is rescored at once, along with both sides of a comparison. Your weights are saved in this browser only.

    No case loaded—

    Solid bar: points earned. Outline: points available. Factors with no data are left out of the total and marked “not scored”.

    Section D · Side by side

    Two coins, one bench

    Both coins are judged under the same weights. The stronger finding on each line gets the mark.

    Section E · Method

    The Rulebook

    How each factor is read, where the data comes from, and how points are given. Nothing is hidden and nothing is learned from data: these are fixed rules you can check by hand.

    Fig. 2 How evidence becomes points. Each curve is the exact rule the engine applies: the reading along the bottom, the share of the factor’s weight it earns up the side.

    1 · Mint authority

    Read from the mint account with getAccountInfo. If any key can still mint, supply is not fixed: zero points, and the verdict can be no better than Mixed Record. Revoked: full points.

    2 · Freeze authority

    Same source. A freeze authority can lock any holder’s account and stop them selling. Set: zero points, and a cap at Mixed Record. Stablecoins keep one for compliance, so read this in context.

    3 · Token-2022 extensions

    A classic SPL token gets full points. For Token-2022 mints we list every extension. A permanent delegate, a transfer hook, a non-transferable flag, a pausable flag or frozen-by-default accounts score zero, and a permanent delegate also caps the verdict. A transfer fee of 1% or less scores half.

    4 · Liquidity depth

    The USD liquidity of the deepest DexScreener pair, on a log scale from $5,000 (zero) to $500,000 (full). Coins still on a bonding curve have no pool yet and score 30%.

    5 · Liquidity to market cap

    Pool depth divided by market cap. At 10% or more, a large holder can exit without wrecking the price: full points. Below 2%: zero. Linear in between.

    6 · Age

    From the earliest pair creation time, on a log scale from one hour (zero) to thirty days (full). Age proves nothing on its own, but most rugs happen early.

    7 · Top-10 concentration

    From getTokenLargestAccounts. We look up who owns each account and leave out pools, curves and other program-owned accounts. Then we add the ten largest remaining holders. 20% or less: full points. 60% or more: zero. If the RPC is busy, we use Jupiter’s top-holder figure and say so.

    8 · Holder count

    Jupiter’s holder count on a log scale from 100 (zero) to 10,000 (full).

    9 · Organic activity

    Jupiter’s organic score, 0–100, which estimates how much trading comes from real wallets rather than bots. Used as given.

    10 · Trade balance

    Buys as a share of 24-hour transactions on DexScreener. Anything between 40% and 60% is normal and gets full points. The score falls to zero at 10% or 90%, where trading is all one way.

    The ruling

    Score = points earned ÷ points available among the factors that have data × 100. 75 and over: Clean Record. 50–74: Mixed Record. Under 50: Red Flags. A hard flag (mint authority, freeze authority or permanent delegate) caps the ruling at Mixed Record, however high the score.

    Section F · Case files

    Recent rulings at this desk

    The last twenty cases you opened, kept in this browser’s storage. Reopen one to rule again on fresh data.

      Section G · Letters to the editor

      You asked, we answered

      Is a Clean Record a reason to buy?

      No. A verdict describes how a token is set up and traded right now. It cannot see the team’s intentions, wallets they control under other names, or tomorrow’s price. Memecoins are highly speculative and most lose most of their value. Verdictly gives no investment advice.

      Where does each number come from?

      Market data comes from DexScreener’s public API. Authorities, extensions and supply come from the token’s mint account on Solana, read through this site’s read-only RPC proxy. The largest holders come from the same proxy. Holder count, organic score and the fallback top-holder figure come from Jupiter’s public token API. Every call runs in your browser, and each finding names its source.

      Why leave pools out of the top-10?

      A pool or bonding curve often holds the largest single slice of supply, but nobody can dump it the way a wallet can. We resolve the owner of each large account. Accounts owned by the pair address, by known pool authorities, or by program-owned accounts such as lockers and vaults are listed apart and not counted.

      What if a data source is down?

      That factor is marked “not scored” and its weight is dropped from the total, so a missing check never counts for or against a coin. The case card says which checks were missing. If the top-holder RPC call fails, we fall back to Jupiter’s figure and label it.

      Can I change how you weigh things?

      Yes, in Section C. The weights stay in your browser. Two people with different weights can reach different verdicts on the same evidence. That is the point of showing the working.

      Why did a well-known coin get Mixed Record?

      Usually a hard flag. Many established tokens, including major stablecoins, keep a freeze or mint authority on purpose. The rulebook caps those at Mixed Record because the power exists, whoever holds it.

      Do you sign, trade or hold anything?

      No. Verdictly only reads public data. It never asks you to connect a wallet or sign anything. It holds no funds and runs no trades.

      Is Verdictly affiliated with any other checker?

      No. Verdictly is an independent publication with its own method, described in full in the Rulebook.